[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240817101541.1664-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 18:15:41 +0800
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To: <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <maz@...nel.org>, <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, <james.morse@....com>,
<suzuki.poulose@....com>, <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>, Zenghui Yu
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: vgic-debug: Don't put unmarked LPIs
If there were LPIs being mapped behind our back (i.e., between .start() and
.stop()), we would put them at iter_unmark_lpis() without checking if they
were actually *marked*, which is obviously not good.
Switch to use the xa_for_each_marked() iterator to fix it.
Fixes: 85d3ccc8b75b ("KVM: arm64: vgic-debug: Use an xarray mark for debug iterator")
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c
index bc74d06398ef..e1397ab2072a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void iter_unmark_lpis(struct kvm *kvm)
struct vgic_irq *irq;
unsigned long intid;
- xa_for_each(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq) {
+ xa_for_each_marked(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER) {
xa_clear_mark(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER);
vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
}
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists