[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240817133207.3585371b@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:32:07 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Albrieux
<jonathan.albrieux@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux@...nlining.org, Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: iio: imu: magnetometer: Add ak09118
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:17:52 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2024 20:28, barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org wrote:
> > On 2024-08-10 14:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 09/08/2024 22:25, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
> >>> From: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>
> >>>
> >>> Document asahi-kasei,ak09918 compatible.
> >>
> >> Not much improved here.
> > I have removed Reviewed-by because fallback compatible is a different
> > approach
> > and I would not mind second look.
>
> You received specific comments. You ignored them, so I replied that you
> ignored them. And your excuse is that you ask for review? This does not
> work like this. Read CAREFULLY form letter below.
>
> >>
> >> <form letter>
> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> >>
> >> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
> >> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
> >> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
> >> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >> </form letter>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/asahi-kasei,ak8975.yaml
> >>> | 3 +++
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git
> >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/asahi-kasei,ak8975.yaml
> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/asahi-kasei,ak8975.yaml
> >>> index 9790f75fc669..ff93a935363f 100644
> >>> ---
> >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/asahi-kasei,ak8975.yaml
> >>> +++
> >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/magnetometer/asahi-kasei,ak8975.yaml
> >>> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ properties:
> >>> - asahi-kasei,ak09911
> >>> - asahi-kasei,ak09912
> >>> - asahi-kasei,ak09916
> >>> + - items:
> >>> + - const: asahi-kasei,ak09918
> >>> + - const: asahi-kasei,ak09912
> >>
> >> Why? Your driver suggests it might not be compatible... Can device bind
> >> using ak09912 and operate up to ak09912 extend?
> > It is register compatible and it can bind on 09112, as I understand
> > fallback compatible
>
> ok
>
> > was a request from Connor and Jonathan in the previous round.
>
> Not entirely, you should read comments more carefully.
Given the device specific data is only different in terms of the ID
register value, a fallback seems fine, but you should add to this
patch description something to say that this device is register
compatible etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists