lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b84cdf2-34c8-4e61-857e-79a1d5e782da@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 17:43:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
	Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
	Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
	Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v17 00/14] Introduce PHY listing and
 link_topology tracking

> Jakub, as you say it looks solid. I can add to that that I have been using
> this series widely through the double Ethernet attachment on several boards
> and it works well, it is stable and more performant than the dirty home-made
> solution we had on v4.14.

Have you posted a Tested-by:

You can also post Reviewed-by: if you have taken a look at the
code. It won't have the same value as one from Rusell, but it does add
some degree of warm fuzzy feeling this code is O.K, and it starts
building your reputation as a reviewer.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ