[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsArnB9ItrxUmXHW@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 05:48:28 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, djwong@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org,
brauner@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com, jack@...e.cz,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, chengzhihao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial
zeroing
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:11:58PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> poff, plen, srcmap);
> if (status)
> return status;
> + iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
> }
> - iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
> } while ((block_start += plen) < block_end);
Um, what I meant was to just delete the iomap_set_range_uptodate()
call in __iomap_write_begin() altogether. We'll call it soon enough in
__iomap_write_end().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists