[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024081700-skittle-lethargy-9567@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:17:53 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@...sung.com>
Cc: Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jh0801.jung@...sung.com,
dh10.jung@...sung.com, naushad@...sung.com, akash.m5@...sung.com,
rc93.raju@...sung.com, taehyun.cho@...sung.com,
hongpooh.kim@...sung.com, eomji.oh@...sung.com,
shijie.cai@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: dwc3: core: Prevent USB core invalid event
buffer address access
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:13:09PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
>
> On 8/16/2024 3:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:18:31PM +0530, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> >> This commit addresses an issue where the USB core could access an
> >> invalid event buffer address during runtime suspend, potentially causing
> >> SMMU faults and other memory issues in Exynos platforms. The problem
> >> arises from the following sequence.
> >> 1. In dwc3_gadget_suspend, there is a chance of a timeout when
> >> moving the USB core to the halt state after clearing the
> >> run/stop bit by software.
> >> 2. In dwc3_core_exit, the event buffer is cleared regardless of
> >> the USB core's status, which may lead to an SMMU faults and
> >> other memory issues. if the USB core tries to access the event
> >> buffer address.
> >>
> >> To prevent this hardware quirk on Exynos platforms, this commit ensures
> >> that the event buffer address is not cleared by software when the USB
> >> core is active during runtime suspend by checking its status before
> >> clearing the buffer address.
> >>
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.1+
> > Any hint as to what commit id this fixes?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> This issue is not related to any particular commit. The given fix is
> address a hardware quirk on the Exynos platform. And we require it to be
> backported on stable kernel 6.1 and above all stable kernel.
If it's a hardware quirk issue, why are you restricting it to a specific
kernel release and not a specific kernel commit? Why not 5.15? 5.4?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists