[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024081850-wise-ladies-5162@gregkh>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 10:54:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@...glemail.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 00/25] 6.10.6-rc2 review
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 01:40:57PM +0200, Peter Schneider wrote:
> Am 16.08.2024 um 11:42 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.6 release.
> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> Now I'm a little bit confused. I saw you announced a new 6.10.6 RC and I
> wanted to (re-)test it. Your subject says -rc2, but when I git fetch from
> the kernel.org linux-stable-rc git repo (which I always do) what I get is
> -rc3 from today, however I have not (yet) seen a mail from you announcing
> -rc3. Forgot to send that one out? Anyway, -rc3 is what I tested, and as I
> already reported for -rc1, it is fine on my machine, too.
You are right, I forgot to send the email for -rc3 out, my fault, was
trying to do other things on a Saturday other than kernel work :)
now sent, and thanks for testing!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists