[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSe0HkzX0gy5Oo+549wG9xqfeHmsveJqdR_xRcYtim+sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 13:22:48 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Fan Wu <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, fsverity@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, audit@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 12/20] dm verity: expose root hash digest and
signature data to LSMs
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM Fan Wu <wufan@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> On 8/16/2024 6:35 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
...
> >>>>
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>> + u8 *root_digest_sig; /* signature of the root digest */
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>> unsigned int salt_size;
> >>>> sector_t data_start; /* data offset in 512-byte sectors */
> >>>> sector_t hash_start; /* hash start in blocks */
> >>>> @@ -58,6 +61,9 @@ struct dm_verity {
> >>>> bool hash_failed:1; /* set if hash of any block failed */
> >>>> bool use_bh_wq:1; /* try to verify in BH wq before normal work-queue */
> >>>> unsigned int digest_size; /* digest size for the current hash algorithm */
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> >>>> + unsigned int sig_size; /* root digest signature size */
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */
> >>>> unsigned int hash_reqsize; /* the size of temporary space for crypto */
> >>>> enum verity_mode mode; /* mode for handling verification errors */
> >>>> unsigned int corrupted_errs;/* Number of errors for corrupted blocks */
> >
> > Just nit-picking: I would move "unsigned int sig_size" up, after "u8
> > *root_digest_sig" entry.
> >
> > Mikulas
>
> Sure, I can make these two fields together.
Fan, do you want me to move the @sig_size field when merging or are
you planning to submit another revision? I'm happy to do it during
the merge, but I don't want to bother if you are going to post another
patchset.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists