[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKbZUD1dA2q9Yv_Z0S4SgvddHxnR9KZddYHAbMLsV+dt+bf8dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 07:36:26 +0100
From: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, jeffxu@...omium.org, oliver.sang@...el.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] selftests/mm: add more mseal traversal tests
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 1:18 AM Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@...il.com> wrote:
> @@ -983,6 +1019,41 @@ static void test_seal_munmap_vma_with_gap(bool seal)
> REPORT_TEST_PASS();
> }
>
> +static void test_seal_munmap_partial_across_vmas(bool seal)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> + unsigned long page_size = getpagesize();
> + unsigned long size = 2 * page_size;
> + int ret;
> + int prot;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if a partial mseal (that results in two vmas) works correctly.
> + * It might unmap the first, but it'll never unmap the second (msealed) vma.
> + */
Bah, obviously this comment isn't true, munmap is never partial.
I'll change this locally for v4 if there ends up being one.
--
Pedro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists