lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ2PR11MB8424B8BE29B1B40EE2F608DEFF8C2@SJ2PR11MB8424.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:27:57 +0000
From: "Liao, Bard" <bard.liao@...el.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-sound@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com" <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] soundwire: add lane field in sdw_port_runtime



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2024 3:21 PM
> To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; pierre-
> louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: add lane field in sdw_port_runtime
> 
> On 06-08-24, 14:09, Bard Liao wrote:
> > Currently, lane_ctrl is always 0. Add a lane field in sdw_port_runtime
> > to indicate the data lane of the data port.
> > They are 0 by default.
> 
> Use of the lane? also missing setting of lane variable, dont see in this
> patch so we are passing garbage? It might work as structure is kzalloced
> but I dont think we should be implicit, programming makes sense

Yes, p_rt is allocated by 	kzalloc. This patch is a preparation of
SouldWire multi-lane support. We will set the lane variable in
the follow-up patch later.

> 
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c                  | 2 +-
> >  drivers/soundwire/bus.h                          | 2 ++
> >  drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c | 4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> > index 0d01849c3586..babb580f3124 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> > @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int amd_sdw_compute_params(struct
> sdw_bus *bus)
> >  			sdw_fill_xport_params(&p_rt->transport_params,
> p_rt->num,
> >  					      false, SDW_BLK_GRP_CNT_1,
> sample_int,
> >  					      port_bo, port_bo >> 8, hstart,
> hstop,
> > -					      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, 0x0);
> > +					      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, p_rt-
> >lane);
> >
> >  			sdw_fill_port_params(&p_rt->port_params,
> >  					     p_rt->num, bps,
> > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h
> > index fda6b24ac2da..ff03b97f1d8b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h
> > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h
> > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ int sdw_find_col_index(int col);
> >   * @transport_params: Transport parameters
> >   * @port_params: Port parameters
> >   * @port_node: List node for Master or Slave port_list
> > + * @lane: Which lane is used
> >   *
> >   * SoundWire spec has no mention of ports for Master interface but the
> >   * concept is logically extended.
> > @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ struct sdw_port_runtime {
> >  	struct sdw_transport_params transport_params;
> >  	struct sdw_port_params port_params;
> >  	struct list_head port_node;
> > +	unsigned int lane;
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c
> b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c
> > index b9316207c3ab..abf9b85daa52 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/generic_bandwidth_allocation.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ void sdw_compute_slave_ports(struct
> sdw_master_runtime *m_rt,
> >  					      sample_int, port_bo, port_bo >> 8,
> >  					      t_data->hstart,
> >  					      t_data->hstop,
> > -					      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, 0x0);
> > +					      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, p_rt-
> >lane);
> >
> >  			sdw_fill_port_params(&p_rt->port_params,
> >  					     p_rt->num, bps,
> > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void sdw_compute_master_ports(struct
> sdw_master_runtime *m_rt,
> >  		sdw_fill_xport_params(&p_rt->transport_params, p_rt->num,
> >  				      false, SDW_BLK_GRP_CNT_1, sample_int,
> >  				      *port_bo, (*port_bo) >> 8, hstart, hstop,
> > -				      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, 0x0);
> > +				      SDW_BLK_PKG_PER_PORT, p_rt->lane);
> >
> >  		sdw_fill_port_params(&p_rt->port_params,
> >  				     p_rt->num, bps,
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> 
> --
> ~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ