[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00438587-4e9c-411b-bc67-82cabf251c8a@t-8ch.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:31:49 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Xinhui Pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, jinzh <jinzh@...hub.amd.com>,
Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@....com>, Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@....com>, Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@....com>,
Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky@....com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] drm/edid: constify argument of drm_edid_is_valid()
On 2024-08-19 11:21:21+0000, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2024, Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net> wrote:
> > drm_edid_is_valid() does not modify its argument, so mark it as const.
>
> That's not true.
Indeed, thanks for noticing.
It turns out this patch is not necessary anyways and I dropped it for
the next revision.
Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists