linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 0/5] TDX host: kexec() support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240819212156.166703-1-sagis@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:21:56 -0700
From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>
To: kai.huang@...el.com
Cc: bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, 
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, 
	seanjc@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, 
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/5] TDX host: kexec() support

> Currently kexec() support and TDX host are muturally exclusive in the
> Kconfig.  This series adds the TDX host kexec support so that they can
> work together and can be enabled at the same time in the Kconfig.

I tried testing the kexec functionality and noticed that the TDX module
fails initialization on the second kernel so you can't actually kexec
between 2 kernels that enable TDX. Is that the expected behavior? Are
there future patches to enable that functionality?