linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: kvm: fix mkdir error when building for unsupported arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZsPEEFvoGYjW3vfx@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 22:15:44 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	kernel@...labora.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: kvm: fix mkdir error when building for
 unsupported arch

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 09:33:17AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> And other KVM maintainers, the big question is: if we do the above, would now be
> a decent time to bite the bullet and switch to the kernel's canonical arch paths,
> i.e. arm64, s390, and x86?  I feel like if we're ever going to get away from
> using aarch64, x86_64, and s390x, this is as about a good of an opportunity as
> we're going to get.

I'm pretty much indifferent on the matter, but I won't complain if you
send out a change for this.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver