[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1f9013d-f520-44de-b961-bf60bdee8181@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:12:14 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@...il.com>, rick.wertenbroek@...g-vd.ch
Cc: alberto.dassatti@...g-vd.ch,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Move DMA check into
read/write/copy functions
On 8/19/24 21:01, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> The pci-epf-test PCI endpoint function /drivers/pci/endpoint/function/pci-epf_test.c
> is meant to be used in a PCI endpoint device inside a host computer with
> the host side driver: /drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c.
>
> The host side driver can request read/write/copy transactions from the
> endpoint function and expects an IRQ from the endpoint function once
> the read/write/copy transaction is finished. These can be issued with or
> without DMA enabled. If the host side driver requests a read/write/copy
> transaction with DMA enabled and the endpoint function does not support
> DMA, the endpoint would only print an error message and wait for further
> commands without sending an IRQ because pci_epf_test_raise_irq() is
> skipped in pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(). This results in the host side
> driver hanging indefinitely waiting for the IRQ.
>
> Move the DMA check into the pci_epf_test_read()/write()/copy() functions
> so that they report a transfer (IO) error and that pci_epf_test_raise_irq()
> is called when a transfer with DMA is requested, even if unsupported.
>
> The host side driver will no longer hang but report an error on transfer
> (printing "NOT OKAY") thanks to the checksum because no data was moved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@...il.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists