linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <929c322e-7385-48da-b925-7f363cf5b6f7@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:01:15 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
 Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
 Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings

On 19/08/2024 07:55, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: clock: Add AST2700 clock bindings
>>
>> On 13/08/2024 03:53, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>> Drop the define for number of clocks from the header, because it is
>>>> not a
>>
>> *NUMBER OF CLOCKS*
>>
>>>> binding. You can put it in the driver or not, I don't care and do not
>>>> provide guidance on this because I don't know if it makes sense at all.
>>>> What I know is that number of clocks is not related to binding. It is
>>>> not needed
>>
>> *NUMBER OF CLOCKS*
>>
>>>> in the binding, either.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I am confused.
>>> if you think that number of clocks is not related to binding.
>>
>> *NUMBER OF CLOCKS*
>>
>>> How dtsi claim for clk?
>>> For example in dtsi.
>>> include <dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h>
>>> usb3bhp: usb3bhp {
>>> ....
>>> clocks = <&syscon0 SCU0_CLK_GATE_PORTAUSB>;
>>
>> And where is *NUMBER OF CLOCKS* here? I don't see any problem. No
>> useless SCU0_CLK_GATE_NUM define here.
>>
> Understood now, I will remove those *NUMBER OF CLOCKS*.
> And will replace to 
> #define SCU0_CLK_END  34

NAK, it's like you keep ignoring my comments entirely. Even if you call
it "SCU0_CLK_NOT_END" it does not change. Do you understand that it is
not about name? Read my first comment.

> 
> Refer:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/dt-bindings/clock/imx8-clock.h#L87

So you found a bug and this allows you to create the same bug?


Best regards,
Krzysztof