lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <342511df-d321-4a77-b76a-77f3844d7fa3@fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 06:04:02 +0000
From: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev"
	<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: "vishal.l.verma@...el.com" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	"dave.jiang@...el.com" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "ira.weiny@...el.com"
	<ira.weiny@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvdimm: Fix devs leaks in scan_labels()



On 10/08/2024 06:55, Dan Williams wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> [..]
>> @@ -2036,12 +2038,10 @@ static struct device **scan_labels(struct nd_region *nd_region)
> 
> ...of course you would also need something like:
> 
> if (!count) {
> 	kfree(devs);
> 	return NULL;
> }

It seems we don't need this cleanup, in the count=0 case, we would reach `err` to free devs.

Thanks
Zhijian


> 
> ...here, I'll leave that to you to fix up and test.
> 
>>          return devs;
>>   
>>    err:
>> -       if (devs) {
>> -               for (i = 0; devs[i]; i++)
>> -                       namespace_pmem_release(devs[i]);
>> -               kfree(devs);
>> -       }
>> -       return NULL;
>> +        for (i = 0; devs[i]; i++)
>> +                namespace_pmem_release(devs[i]);
>> +        kfree(devs);
>> +        return NULL;
>>   }
>>   

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ