linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c817bf05-a9fa-4fb9-b8c6-a1de5a44e59a@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:28:49 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
Cc: baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, chrisl@...nel.org, hanchuanhua@...o.com,
 ioworker0@...il.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kasong@...cent.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, v-songbaohua@...o.com,
 ziy@...dia.com, yuanshuai@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP

On 18.08.24 09:58, Barry Song wrote:
> Hi Andrew, David, Usama,
> 
> I'm attempting to rebase this series on top of Usama's
> [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: split underutilized THPs[1]
> 
> However, I feel it is impossible and we might be tackling things
> in the wrong order.

Is just the ordering suboptimal (which can/will get resolved one way or 
the other), or is there something fundamental that will make this series 
here "impossible"?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb