[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsKg2fIjo41T0VTH@linux.bj.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:33:13 +0800
From: Tao Su <tao1.su@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kai.huang@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] KVM: TDX: Initialize KVM supported capabilities
when module setup
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:48:05PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>
> While TDX module reports a set of capabilities/features that it
> supports, what KVM currently supports might be a subset of them.
> E.g., DEBUG and PERFMON are supported by TDX module but currently not
> supported by KVM.
>
> Introduce a new struct kvm_tdx_caps to store KVM's capabilities of TDX.
> supported_attrs and suppported_xfam are validated against fixed0/1
> values enumerated by TDX module. Configurable CPUID bits derive from TDX
> module plus applying KVM's capabilities (KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID),
> i.e., mask off the bits that are configurable in the view of TDX module
> but not supported by KVM yet.
>
But this mask is not implemented in this patch, which should be in patch24?
> KVM_TDX_CPUID_NO_SUBLEAF is the concept from TDX module, switch it to 0
> and use KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX, which are the concept of KVM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists