[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240819101913.489513-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 20:19:13 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: cassel@...nel.org
Cc: dlemoal@...nel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<hch@....de>,
linux-ppc@...la.no,
vidra@...l.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ata: pata_macio: Use WARN instead of BUG
The overflow/underflow conditions in pata_macio_qc_prep() should never
happen. But if they do there's no need to kill the system entirely, a
WARN and failing the IO request should be sufficient and might allow the
system to keep running.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
---
drivers/ata/pata_macio.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Not sure if AC_ERR_OTHER is the right error code to use?
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_macio.c b/drivers/ata/pata_macio.c
index eaffa510de49..552e3ac0d391 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_macio.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_macio.c
@@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static enum ata_completion_errors pata_macio_qc_prep(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
while (sg_len) {
/* table overflow should never happen */
- BUG_ON (pi++ >= MAX_DCMDS);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pi >= MAX_DCMDS))
+ return AC_ERR_OTHER;
len = (sg_len < MAX_DBDMA_SEG) ? sg_len : MAX_DBDMA_SEG;
table->command = cpu_to_le16(write ? OUTPUT_MORE: INPUT_MORE);
@@ -566,11 +567,13 @@ static enum ata_completion_errors pata_macio_qc_prep(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
addr += len;
sg_len -= len;
++table;
+ ++pi;
}
}
/* Should never happen according to Tejun */
- BUG_ON(!pi);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pi))
+ return AC_ERR_OTHER;
/* Convert the last command to an input/output */
table--;
--
2.46.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists