linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Rockchip SPI: Runtime PM usage count underflow!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAMcf8Ctr9rOZ2oOzk48haakJOO2bzyNURb2oZTRxJ3tnafXUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:14:06 +0200
From: Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com>
To: Huang-Huang Bao <i@....me>, 
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Rockchip SPI: Runtime PM usage count underflow!

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:49 PM Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:12 AM Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 8:13 PM Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > i am a user of the CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV device.
> > > It stopped working between 6.8 and 6.10.5.
> > > The SPI bus itself reports no errors to userspace, but no devices
> > > appear connected to the bus.
> > > The platform used is RK3328.
> > > The only spi-related message in dmesg is:
> > > rockchip-spi ff190000.spi: Runtime PM usage count underflow!
> > >
> > > Please, can somebody review this issue?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >   Vicente.
> >
> > I've tried to bisect, but there is some strange behaviour:
> > The message "Runtime PM usage count underflow!" can also appear on a
> > good kernel.
> > In order to have a reasoble iteration speed, i am updating the kernel via kexec.
> > If a good kernel (6.6.30) is cold-booted, then, all the kernels
> > kexec'd from it work too.
> > If a bad kernel (6.10.5) is cold-booted, then a 6.6.30 is kexec'd and
> > then the same 6.10.5 is kexec'd it becomes a good one.
>
> Added:
> Huang-Huang Bao <i@....me>
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
> The first offending commit is:
> 29d8101fb9442544077e68e27839a1979f85633d pinctrl: rockchip: fix pinmux
> bits for RK3328 GPIO2-B pins
>
> I've also tested 6.10.6 with it reverted (and
> 456447ff1fe3c28e2fd7b57a79650f62245c6428 and
> 7127c68c76f120367b9a5053f524df0b603d4a48 as dependencies) and SPI
> works fine.

Sorry for the noise:
reverting only 29d8101fb9442544077e68e27839a1979f85633d makes it work on 6.10.6.
Ignore what i said about 456447ff1fe3c28e2fd7b57a79650f62245c6428 and
7127c68c76f120367b9a5053f524df0b603d4a48.

> Regards,
>   Vicente.