linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] drm/bridge: Verify lane assignment is going to work during atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-0n50xcj21WiPHW9ATE7BfxKpOWvdV7of97G_U5ZrMV0zUUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:24:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>, 
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, 
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>, 
	Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, 
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, 
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] drm/bridge: Verify lane assignment is going to
 work during atomic_check

Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-20 10:17:46)
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 10:12:55AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Andy Shevchenko (2024-08-20 03:09:29)
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:38:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > +     /*
> > > > +      * Ensure this bridge is aware that the next bridge wants to
> > > > +      * reassign lanes.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     for (i = 0; i < num_input_lanes; i++)
> > > > +             if (i != input_lanes[i].logical && !num_output_lanes)
> > > > +                     return -ENOTSUPP;
> > >
> > > Besides missing {} this code is internal to the Linux kernel. Is it okay?
> >
> > ENOTSUPP is used by select_bus_fmt_recursive() so I simply followed that
> > style.
>
> Okay, just be aware of that side effect of that code, also checkpatch may
> complain (however it might be false positive).

Yes checkpatch complained but didn't enlighten me. Please tell me the
side effect as I'm unaware!