[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64d13efd3119429ed876ad7ea499cff62e100fb9.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:16:30 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Michael
Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 03:05 +0000, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for
> > > AST2700
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2024-08-14 at 06:35 +0000, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support
> > > > > for
> > > > > AST2700
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 06:10:22AM +0000, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed:
> > > > > > > support for
> > > > > > > AST2700
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 09/08/2024 07:55, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed:
> > > > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > AST2700
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 08/08/2024 09:59, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Add compatible support for AST2700 clk, reset,
> > > > > > > > > > pinctrl,
> > > > > > > > > > silicon-id and example for AST2700 scu.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > .../bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml | 31
> > > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git
> > > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2
> > > > > > > > > > x00-
> > > > > > > > > > scu.yaml
> > > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2
> > > > > > > > > > x00-
> > > > > > > > > > scu.yaml
> > > > > > > > > > index 86ee69c0f45b..c0965f08ae8c 100644
> > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2
> > > > > > > > > > x00-
> > > > > > > > > > scu.yaml
> > > > > > > > > > +++
> > > > > > > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2
> > > > > > > > > > x00-
> > > > > > > > > > scu.y
> > > > > > > > > > +++ aml
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ properties:
> > > > > > > > > > - aspeed,ast2400-scu
> > > > > > > > > > - aspeed,ast2500-scu
> > > > > > > > > > - aspeed,ast2600-scu
> > > > > > > > > > + - aspeed,ast2700-scu0
> > > > > > > > > > + - aspeed,ast2700-scu1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What are the differences between these two?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The next [PATCH 4/4] is scu driver that include
> > > > > > > > ast2700-scu0
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > ast2700-scu1 CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(ast2700_soc0,
> > > > > > > > "aspeed,ast2700-scu0", ast2700_soc0_clk_init);
> > > > > > > > CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(ast2700_soc1, "aspeed,ast2700-
> > > > > > > > scu1",
> > > > > > > > ast2700_soc1_clk_init);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are hardware differences? Entirely different
> > > > > > > devices?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AST2700 have two soc die connected each other.
> > > > > > Each soc die have it own scu, so the naming is ast2700-scu0
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > soc0,
> > > > > another is ast2700-scu1 for soc1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Didn't I see in another patch one die is cpu and one is io?
> > > > > Use
> > > > > those in the compatible rather than 0 and 1 if so.
> > > > >
> > > > Sorry, I want to align with our datasheet description.
> > > > It will but scu0 and scu1 register setting.
> > >
> > > Can we document that relationship in the binding? Rob's
> > > suggestion
> > > seems more descriptive.
> > Hello,
> > Do you want me document it in yaml file or just in commit
> > message?
>
> Hello Rob, Andrew,
> I will add in yaml file in description. Like following.
>
> description:
> The Aspeed System Control Unit manages the global behaviour of the
> SoC,
> configuring elements such as clocks, pinmux, and reset.
> + In AST2700, it has two soc combination. Each soc include its own
> scu register control.
> + ast2700-scu0 for soc0, ast2700-scu1 for soc1.
>
> Is that will be better way ?
What Rob is suggesting is to add the compatibles "aspeed,ast2700-scu-
cpu" and "aspeed,ast2700-scu-io", and then in the description say
something like:
The AST2700 integrates both a CPU and an IO die, each with their own
SCU. The "aspeed,ast2700-scu-cpu" and "aspeed,ast2700-scu-io"
compatibles correspond to SCU0 and SCU1 respectively.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists