lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240820065511.996453-2-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:55:11 +0800
From: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
To: <heming.zhao@...e.com>
CC: <jlbec@...lplan.org>, <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>,
        <mark@...heh.com>, <ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <syzbot+ab134185af9ef88dfed5@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] ocfs2: Fix uaf in ocfs2_read_blocks

In the for-loop after the 'read_failure' label, the condition
'(bh == NULL) && flags includes OCFS2_BH_READAHEAD' is missing.
When this contidion is true, this for-loop will call ocfs2_set_buffer
_uptodate(ci, bh), which then triggers a NULL pointer access error.

Reported-and-suggested-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
index e62c7e1de4eb..b4a76f45253d 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
@@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 block, int nr,
 					goto read_failure;
 			}
 		}
+		if (!bh)
+			continue;
 
 		/* Always set the buffer in the cache, even if it was
 		 * a forced read, or read-ahead which hasn't yet
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ