[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bd97781fbd2e82a6c14a2e22aff2d4304c3206e.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 07:05:00 +0000
From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "rjw@...ysocki.net"
<rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: "lukasz.luba@....com" <lukasz.luba@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] thermal: core: Rearrange checks in
thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip()
On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 17:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> It is not necessary to look up the thermal zone and the cooling
> device
> in the respective global lists to check whether or not they are
> registered. It is sufficient to check whether or not their
> respective
> list nodes are empty for this purpose.
>
> Use the above observation to simplify thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip().
> In
> addition, eliminate an unnecessary ternary operator from it.
>
> Moreover, add lockdep_assert_held() for thermal_list_lock to it
> because
> that lock must be held by its callers when it is running.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
thanks,
rui
> ---
>
> v1 -> v3: No changes
>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 16 ++++------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -781,25 +781,17 @@ int thermal_bind_cdev_to_trip(struct the
> {
> struct thermal_instance *dev;
> struct thermal_instance *pos;
> - struct thermal_zone_device *pos1;
> - struct thermal_cooling_device *pos2;
> bool upper_no_limit;
> int result;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(pos1, &thermal_tz_list, node) {
> - if (pos1 == tz)
> - break;
> - }
> - list_for_each_entry(pos2, &thermal_cdev_list, node) {
> - if (pos2 == cdev)
> - break;
> - }
> + lockdep_assert_held(&thermal_list_lock);
>
> - if (tz != pos1 || cdev != pos2)
> + if (list_empty(&tz->node) || list_empty(&cdev->node))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* lower default 0, upper default max_state */
> - lower = lower == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT ? 0 : lower;
> + if (lower == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT)
> + lower = 0;
>
> if (upper == THERMAL_NO_LIMIT) {
> upper = cdev->max_state;
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists