[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsRRUrNnveqU6bSV@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:18:26 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yu Jiaoliang <yujiaoliang@...o.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
Michal Mrozek <michal.mrozek@...el.com>,
Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@...el.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@...el.com>,
Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers:gt:Switch to use kmemdup_array()
Hi Yi,
Please, next time check with "git drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt" to
better understand the patch formatting.
The title should be something like:
drm/i915/gt: Switch to use kmemdup_array()
But sounds more grammatically correct
drm/i915/gt: Use kmemdup_array instead of kmemdup for multiple allocation
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 03:45:03PM +0800, Yu Jiaoliang wrote:
> Let the kememdup_array() take care about multiplication and possible
> overflows.
Leave one blank line between the commit log and the tag section
> Signed-off-by: Yu Jiaoliang <yujiaoliang@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 09a287c1aedd..d90348c56765 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ static void wa_init_finish(struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> {
> /* Trim unused entries. */
> if (!IS_ALIGNED(wal->count, WA_LIST_CHUNK)) {
> - struct i915_wa *list = kmemdup(wal->list,
> - wal->count * sizeof(*list),
> + struct i915_wa *list = kmemdup_array(wal->list,
> + wal->count, sizeof(*list),
> GFP_KERNEL);
Here you are not aligning correctly. Everything should be aligned
to one character after the open parenthesis; for example:
struct i915_wa *list = kmemdup_array(wal->list, wal->count,
sizeof(*list), GFP_KERNEL);
Patch is good, though looking forward to receiving v2.
Thanks,
Andi
>
> if (list) {
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists