[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <980b3f4d-f265-4eb4-96a3-8f1a75588193@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:32:29 +0800
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
To: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
Cc: jlbec@...lplan.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark@...heh.com, ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
syzbot+ab134185af9ef88dfed5@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ocfs2: Fix uaf in ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate
Could you resend v3 with both patches?
And add my "Reviewed-by" tag to another patch.
btw, you miss change log area from v2.
-Heming
On 8/20/24 15:37, Lizhi Xu wrote:
> In the for-loop after the 'read_failure' label, the condition
> '(bh == NULL) && flags includes OCFS2_BH_READAHEAD' is missing.
> When this contidion is true, this for-loop will call ocfs2_set_buffer
> _uptodate(ci, bh), which then triggers a NULL pointer access error.
>
> Reported-and-suggested-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> index e62c7e1de4eb..8f714406528d 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 block, int nr,
> /* Always set the buffer in the cache, even if it was
> * a forced read, or read-ahead which hasn't yet
> * completed. */
> - ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate(ci, bh);
> + if (bh)
> + ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate(ci, bh);
> }
> ocfs2_metadata_cache_io_unlock(ci);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists