lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e6075a6-20a9-42ee-8f10-377ba9b0291b@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:00:31 +0530
From: Beleswar Prasad Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Apurva Nandan
	<a-nandan@...com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix driver shutdown

Hi Jan,

On 19-08-2024 22:17, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>
> When k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit is run, core 1 is shutdown and removed
> first. When core 0 should then be stopped before its removal, it will
> find core1->rproc as NULL already and crashes. Happens on rmmod e.g.


Did you check this on top of -next-20240820 tag? There was a series[0] 
which was merged recently which fixed this condition. I don't see this 
issue when trying on top of -next-20240820 tag.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240808074127.2688131-1-b-padhi@ti.com/

>
> Fixes: 3c8a9066d584 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Do not allow core1 to power up before core0 via sysfs")
> CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> ---
>
> There might be one more because I can still make this driver crash
> after an operator error. Were error scenarios tested at all?


Can you point out what is this issue more specifically, and I can take 
this up then.

>
>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index eb09d2e9b32a..9ebd7a34e638 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>   		/* do not allow core 0 to stop before core 1 */
>   		core1 = list_last_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core,
>   					elem);
> -		if (core != core1 && core1->rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE) {
> +		if (core != core1 && core1->rproc &&
> +		    core1->rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE) {
>   			dev_err(dev, "%s: can not stop core 0 before core 1\n",
>   				__func__);
>   			ret = -EPERM;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ