[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4y37wrg7gi3unpqw5ukgd6jrwuqmuofcabhmtwzlgfpgtiighw@74abrhmpzktv>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:25:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_viswanat@...cinc.com, quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com,
quic_varada@...cinc.com, quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: add hexagon based WCSS secure PIL
driver
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 02:25:15PM +0530, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote:
> From: Vignesh Viswanathan <quic_viswanat@...cinc.com>
>
> Add support to bring up hexagon based WCSS secure PIL remoteproc.
> IPQ5332, IPQ9574 supports secure PIL remoteproc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Viswanathan <quic_viswanat@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
> +static int wcss_sec_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
> + const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + int num_segs, index = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Parse through additional reserved memory regions for the rproc
> + * and add them to the coredump segments
> + */
> + num_segs = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
> + "memory-region", NULL);
> + while (index < num_segs) {
> + node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
> + "memory-region", index);
> + if (!node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
> + if (!rmem) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region index %d num_segs %d\n",
> + index, num_segs);
Leaking refcnt.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(node);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Adding segment 0x%pa size 0x%pa",
> + &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
> + ret = rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(rproc,
> + rmem->base,
> + rmem->size,
> + wcss_sec_copy_segment,
> + NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + index++;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops wcss_sec_ops = {
> + .start = wcss_sec_start,
> + .stop = wcss_sec_stop,
> + .da_to_va = wcss_sec_da_to_va,
> + .load = wcss_sec_load,
> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> + .panic = wcss_sec_panic,
> + .parse_fw = wcss_sec_dump_segments,
> +};
> +
> +static int wcss_sec_alloc_memory_region(struct wcss_sec *wcss)
> +{
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct device *dev = wcss->dev;
> +
> + node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> + if (node) {
> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
> + } else {
No, that's over complicated.
Just if (!node) { error handling }.
> + dev_err(dev, "can't find phandle memory-region\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(node);
> +
> + if (!rmem) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + wcss->mem_phys = rmem->base;
> + wcss->mem_reloc = rmem->base;
> + wcss->mem_size = rmem->size;
> + wcss->mem_region = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, wcss->mem_phys, wcss->mem_size);
> + if (!wcss->mem_region) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%pa\n",
> + &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
...
> +static int wcss_sec_ipq5332_init_clk(struct wcss_sec *wcss)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct device *dev = wcss->dev;
> +
> + wcss->im_sleep = devm_clk_get(wcss->dev, "im_sleep");
> + if (IS_ERR(wcss->im_sleep)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(wcss->im_sleep);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get im_sleep clock");
Syntax is return dev_err_probe.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(wcss->im_sleep);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "could not enable im_sleep clk\n");
> + return ret;
Just use devm_clk_get_enabled.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists