[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32a3bb02-59b2-432d-a75b-d7951971cda6@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:42:23 +0200
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org, kees@...nel.org,
wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, arnd@...db.de, ardb@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
leobras@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Prepare to switch to generic entry
On 29/06/2024 10:56, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> -#define on_thread_stack() (on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer, 1))
> +static __always_inline bool on_thread_stack(void)
> +{
> + return on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer, 1);
> +}
This looks reasonable but I wonder why this change is required (as the
commit message suggests)?
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists