[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dee1b427-4436-c040-091f-d5e6094297e1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 20:57:20 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<kees@...nel.org>, <wad@...omium.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <leobras@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Prepare to switch to generic entry
On 2024/8/20 19:42, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 29/06/2024 10:56, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> -#define on_thread_stack() (on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer, 1))
>> +static __always_inline bool on_thread_stack(void)
>> +{
>> + return on_task_stack(current, current_stack_pointer, 1);
>> +}
>
> This looks reasonable but I wonder why this change is required (as the
> commit message suggests)?
There seems to be a compilation problem, but rolling back this function
is ok now.
>
> Kevin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists