lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1B5E3131-0595-47A8-BB8E-14B7B6C3FA7F@dolcini.it>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:34:12 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] wifi: mwifiex: cleanup driver

Hello Sasha,
thanks for the patches.

Il 20 agosto 2024 13:55:25 CEST, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> ha scritto:
>This series has a bunch of cleanup and bugfix patches for the mwifiex
>driver

Would it make sense to sort the patch series in such a way that bug fixes can be backported to stable/long-term versions? Are those bug you could reproduce or just something you noticed while looking into the driver?

...

> 24 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 729 deletions(-)

I had a quick look at the series, and it looks fine to me, I'll try to have a proper look in the next couple of weeks. What I wonder is what's the risk of introducing some subtle bugs because of firmware differences, what device/firmware combination were you able to test?

Francesco 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ