lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsYLKFCvLdMn5FM3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:43:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Guruvendra Punugupati <Guruvendra.Punugupati@....com>,
	Krishnamoorthi M <krishnamoorthi.m@....com>,
	linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Add AMDI5017 ACPI ID to the
 I3C Support List

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 06:42:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 06:39:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 08:42:12PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > > On 8/21/2024 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 07:07:45PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > > >> On 8/21/2024 19:05, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

...

> > > >>> This update adds the AMDI5017 ACPI ID to the list of supported IDs.
> > 
> > s/This update adds/Add/
> > 
> > > > Please, provide a DSDT excerpt to show how it will look like in the ACPI
> > > > tables.
> > > 
> > >     Scope (_SB)
> > >     {
> > > 	...
> > > 
> > >         Name (HCID, "AMDI5017")
> > >         Device (I3CA)
> > >         {
> > >             Method (_HID, 0, Serialized)  // _HID: Hardware ID
> > >             {
> > >                 If ((I30M == Zero))
> > >                 {
> > >                     If (CondRefOf (HCIB))
> > >                     {
> > >                         Return (HCID) /* \_SB_.HCID */
> > >                     }
> > >                     Else
> > >                     {
> > >                         Return (I3ID) /* \_SB_.I3ID */
> > 
> > Do I understand correctly that I3ID is the old one (as per another path I have
> > seen last week or so), i.o.w. *not* a MIPI allocated one?
> > 
> > If it's the case, feel free to add
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > from ACPI ID perspective.
> 
> Regarding MIPI ID and using it as a _CID is kinda unsolved now, in any case
> _CID *requires* _HID to be present, and hence _HID has a priority in
> enumeration. It doesn't matter if it's absent now (it's even more flexible in

Just to be crystal clear

 "It doesn't matter if _CID is absent now..."

> case MIPI decides to use _another_ ID for _CID) as long as software uses
> _HID for enumeration.
> 
> > >                     }
> > >                 }
> > >                 Else
> > >                 {
> > >                     Return (I2ID) /* \_SB_.I2ID */
> > >                 }
> > >             }
> > > 	
> > > 	...
> > >     }

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ