[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240821170734.GJ865349@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:07:34 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, brauner@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
jack@...e.cz, chandan.babu@...cle.com, dchinner@...hat.com,
hch@....de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
kbusch@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign
On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 09:47:57AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Add initial support for new flag FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES for forcealign
> enabled.
>
> This flag is a file attribute that mirrors an ondisk inode flag. Actual
> support for untorn file writes (for now) depends on both the iflag and the
> underlying storage devices, which we can only really check at statx and
> pwritev2() time. This is the same story as FS_XFLAG_DAX, which signals to
> the fs that we should try to enable the fsdax IO path on the file (instead
> of the regular page cache), but applications have to query STAT_ATTR_DAX to
> find out if they really got that IO path.
>
> Current kernel support for atomic writes is based on HW support (for atomic
> writes). As such, it is required to ensure extent alignment with
> atomic_write_unit_max so that an atomic write can result in a single
> HW-compliant IO operation.
>
> rtvol also guarantees extent alignment, but we are basing support initially
> on forcealign, which is not supported for rtvol yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h | 11 +++++--
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_util.c | 4 +++
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c | 2 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 15 +++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 4 ++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 5 ++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 2 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 12 ++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> 12 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> index 04c6cbc943c2..a9f3389438a6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> @@ -353,12 +353,16 @@ xfs_sb_has_compat_feature(
> #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK (1 << 2) /* reflinked files */
> #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT (1 << 3) /* inobt block counts */
> #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN (1 << 30) /* aligned file data extents */
> +#define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ATOMICWRITES (1 << 31) /* atomicwrites enabled */
Do you ever see test failures in xfs/270?
> +
> #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ALL \
> (XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FINOBT | \
> XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_RMAPBT | \
> XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK| \
> XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_INOBTCNT | \
> - XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN)
> + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN | \
> + XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ATOMICWRITES)
> +
> #define XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_UNKNOWN ~XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ALL
> static inline bool
> xfs_sb_has_ro_compat_feature(
> @@ -1097,6 +1101,7 @@ static inline void xfs_dinode_put_rdev(struct xfs_dinode *dip, xfs_dev_t rdev)
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64_BIT 4 /* large extent counters */
> /* data extent mappings for regular files must be aligned to extent size hint */
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN_BIT 5
> +#define XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES_BIT 6
>
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_DAX (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_DAX_BIT)
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK_BIT)
> @@ -1104,10 +1109,12 @@ static inline void xfs_dinode_put_rdev(struct xfs_dinode *dip, xfs_dev_t rdev)
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_BIGTIME (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_BIGTIME_BIT)
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64_BIT)
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN_BIT)
> +#define XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES (1 << XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES_BIT)
>
> #define XFS_DIFLAG2_ANY \
> (XFS_DIFLAG2_DAX | XFS_DIFLAG2_REFLINK | XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE | \
> - XFS_DIFLAG2_BIGTIME | XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 | XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN)
> + XFS_DIFLAG2_BIGTIME | XFS_DIFLAG2_NREXT64 | XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN | \
> + XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES)
>
> static inline bool xfs_dinode_has_bigtime(const struct xfs_dinode *dip)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index 1c59891fa9e2..59933c7df56d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,10 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> struct xfs_dinode *from)
> {
> + struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_sb *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> int error;
> xfs_failaddr_t fa;
>
> @@ -261,6 +264,13 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk(
> }
> if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip))
> xfs_ifork_init_cow(ip);
> +
> + if (xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(ip)) {
> + if (sbp->sb_blocksize < target->bt_bdev_awu_min ||
> + sbp->sb_blocksize * ip->i_extsize > target->bt_bdev_awu_max)
Can this multiplication trigger integer overflows?
> + ip->i_diflags2 &= ~XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES;
Ondisk iflag updates must use transactions.
Or you can fail IOCB_ATOMIC writes if XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES is set
but the forcealign blocksize doesn't fit with awu_min/max.
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> out_destroy_data_fork:
> @@ -483,6 +493,40 @@ xfs_dinode_verify_nrext64(
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static xfs_failaddr_t
> +xfs_inode_validate_atomicwrites(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + uint32_t extsize,
> + uint64_t flags2)
> +{
> + /* superblock rocompat feature flag */
> + if (!xfs_has_atomicwrites(mp))
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + /*
> + * forcealign is required, so rely on sanity checks in
> + * xfs_inode_validate_forcealign()
> + */
> + if (!(flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN))
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + if (!is_power_of_2(extsize))
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + /* Required to guarantee data block alignment */
> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks % extsize)
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + /* Requires stripe unit+width be a multiple of extsize */
> + if (mp->m_dalign && (mp->m_dalign % extsize))
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + if (mp->m_swidth && (mp->m_swidth % extsize))
IIRC m_dalign and m_swidth can be set at mount time, which can result in
inode verifiers logging corruption errors if those parameters change. I
think we should validate these two congruencies when setting
FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE.
> + return __this_address;
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> xfs_failaddr_t
> xfs_dinode_verify(
> struct xfs_mount *mp,
> @@ -666,6 +710,14 @@ xfs_dinode_verify(
> return fa;
> }
>
> + if (flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES) {
> + fa = xfs_inode_validate_atomicwrites(mp,
> + be32_to_cpu(dip->di_extsize),
> + flags2);
> + if (fa)
> + return fa;
> + }
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_util.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_util.c
> index b264939d8855..dbd5b16e1844 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_util.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ xfs_flags2diflags2(
> di_flags2 |= XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE;
> if (xflags & FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN)
> di_flags2 |= XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN;
> + if (xflags & FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES)
> + di_flags2 |= XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES;
>
> return di_flags2;
> }
> @@ -130,6 +132,8 @@ xfs_ip2xflags(
> flags |= FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE;
> if (ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN)
> flags |= FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN;
> + if (ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES)
> + flags |= FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES;
> }
>
> if (xfs_inode_has_attr_fork(ip))
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index e56911553edd..5de8725bf93a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ xfs_sb_version_to_features(
> features |= XFS_FEAT_INOBTCNT;
> if (sbp->sb_features_ro_compat & XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_FORCEALIGN)
> features |= XFS_FEAT_FORCEALIGN;
> + if (sbp->sb_features_ro_compat & XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_ATOMICWRITES)
> + features |= XFS_FEAT_ATOMICWRITES;
> if (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_FTYPE)
> features |= XFS_FEAT_FTYPE;
> if (sbp->sb_features_incompat & XFS_SB_FEAT_INCOMPAT_SPINODES)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index aa4dbda7b536..44bee3e2b2bb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -2060,6 +2060,8 @@ int
> xfs_init_buftarg(
> struct xfs_buftarg *btp,
> size_t logical_sectorsize,
> + unsigned int awu_min,
> + unsigned int awu_max,
> const char *descr)
> {
> /* Set up device logical sector size mask */
> @@ -2086,6 +2088,9 @@ xfs_init_buftarg(
> btp->bt_shrinker->scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
> btp->bt_shrinker->private_data = btp;
> shrinker_register(btp->bt_shrinker);
> +
> + btp->bt_bdev_awu_min = awu_min;
> + btp->bt_bdev_awu_max = awu_max;
> return 0;
>
> out_destroy_io_count:
> @@ -2102,6 +2107,7 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg(
> {
> struct xfs_buftarg *btp;
> const struct dax_holder_operations *ops = NULL;
> + unsigned int awu_min = 0, awu_max = 0;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_FS_DAX) && defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE)
> ops = &xfs_dax_holder_operations;
> @@ -2115,6 +2121,13 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg(
> btp->bt_daxdev = fs_dax_get_by_bdev(btp->bt_bdev, &btp->bt_dax_part_off,
> mp, ops);
>
> + if (bdev_can_atomic_write(btp->bt_bdev)) {
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(btp->bt_bdev);
> +
> + awu_min = queue_atomic_write_unit_min_bytes(q);
> + awu_max = queue_atomic_write_unit_max_bytes(q);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * When allocating the buftargs we have not yet read the super block and
> * thus don't know the file system sector size yet.
> @@ -2122,7 +2135,7 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg(
> if (xfs_setsize_buftarg(btp, bdev_logical_block_size(btp->bt_bdev)))
> goto error_free;
> if (xfs_init_buftarg(btp, bdev_logical_block_size(btp->bt_bdev),
> - mp->m_super->s_id))
> + awu_min, awu_max, mp->m_super->s_id))
> goto error_free;
>
> return btp;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> index b1580644501f..3bcd8137d739 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
> @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ struct xfs_buftarg {
> struct percpu_counter bt_io_count;
> struct ratelimit_state bt_ioerror_rl;
>
> + unsigned int bt_bdev_awu_min, bt_bdev_awu_max;
Please add a comment here about what these mean. Not everyone is going
to know what "awu" abbreviates.
> +
> /* built-in cache, if we're not using the perag one */
> struct xfs_buf_cache bt_cache[];
> };
> @@ -393,7 +395,7 @@ bool xfs_verify_magic16(struct xfs_buf *bp, __be16 dmagic);
>
> /* for xfs_buf_mem.c only: */
> int xfs_init_buftarg(struct xfs_buftarg *btp, size_t logical_sectorsize,
> - const char *descr);
> + unsigned int awu_min, unsigned int awu_max, const char *descr);
> void xfs_destroy_buftarg(struct xfs_buftarg *btp);
>
> #endif /* __XFS_BUF_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
> index 9bb2d24de709..af48a8da2f0f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_mem.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ xmbuf_alloc(
> btp->bt_meta_sectorsize = XMBUF_BLOCKSIZE;
> btp->bt_meta_sectormask = XMBUF_BLOCKSIZE - 1;
>
> - error = xfs_init_buftarg(btp, XMBUF_BLOCKSIZE, descr);
> + error = xfs_init_buftarg(btp, XMBUF_BLOCKSIZE, 0, 0, descr);
> if (error)
> goto out_bcache;
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> index 336124105c47..cfcb67da12cb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
> @@ -321,6 +321,11 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_forcealign(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> return ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_FORCEALIGN;
> }
>
> +static inline bool xfs_inode_has_atomicwrites(struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +{
> + return ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_ATOMICWRITES;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Decide if this file is a realtime file whose data allocation unit is larger
> * than a single filesystem block.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index a68ec68e5b92..7af2837779e8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -502,6 +502,49 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_forcealign(
> return 0;
> }
>
> +
> +/*
> + * Forcealign requires a power-of-2 extent size hint.
> + */
> +static int
> +xfs_ioctl_setattr_atomicwrites(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + struct fileattr *fa)
> +{
> + struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> + uint32_t extsize = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, fa->fsx_extsize);
> + struct xfs_sb *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> +
> + if (!xfs_has_atomicwrites(mp))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!(fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!is_power_of_2(extsize))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Required to guarantee data block alignment */
> + if (mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks % extsize)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Requires stripe unit+width be a multiple of extsize */
> + if (mp->m_dalign && (mp->m_dalign % extsize))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (mp->m_swidth && (mp->m_swidth % extsize))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (target->bt_bdev_awu_min > sbp->sb_blocksize)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (target->bt_bdev_awu_max < fa->fsx_extsize)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> struct xfs_trans *tp,
> @@ -511,9 +554,12 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> bool rtflag = (fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_REALTIME);
> bool forcealign = fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN;
> + bool atomic_writes;
> uint64_t i_flags2;
> int error;
>
> + atomic_writes = fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES;
> +
> /* Can't change RT or forcealign flags if any extents are allocated. */
> if (rtflag != XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ||
> forcealign != xfs_inode_has_forcealign(ip)) {
> @@ -554,6 +600,12 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> return error;
> }
>
> + if (atomic_writes) {
> + error = xfs_ioctl_setattr_atomicwrites(ip, fa);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> ip->i_diflags = xfs_flags2diflags(ip, fa->fsx_xflags);
> ip->i_diflags2 = i_flags2;
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index 30228fea908d..0c5a3ae3cdaf 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
> #define XFS_FEAT_NREXT64 (1ULL << 26) /* large extent counters */
> #define XFS_FEAT_EXCHANGE_RANGE (1ULL << 27) /* exchange range */
> #define XFS_FEAT_FORCEALIGN (1ULL << 28) /* aligned file data extents */
> +#define XFS_FEAT_ATOMICWRITES (1ULL << 29) /* atomic writes support */
>
> /* Mount features */
> #define XFS_FEAT_NOATTR2 (1ULL << 48) /* disable attr2 creation */
> @@ -387,6 +388,7 @@ __XFS_HAS_V4_FEAT(v3inodes, V3INODES)
> __XFS_HAS_V4_FEAT(crc, CRC)
> __XFS_HAS_V4_FEAT(pquotino, PQUOTINO)
> __XFS_HAS_FEAT(forcealign, FORCEALIGN)
> +__XFS_HAS_FEAT(atomicwrites, ATOMICWRITES)
>
> /*
> * Mount features
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index b52a01b50387..5352b90b2bb6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1721,6 +1721,18 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
> mp->m_features &= ~XFS_FEAT_DISCARD;
> }
>
> + if (xfs_has_atomicwrites(mp)) {
> + if (!xfs_has_forcealign(mp)) {
> + xfs_alert(mp,
> + "forcealign required for atomicwrites!");
This (atomicwrites && !forcealign) ought to be checked in the superblock
verifier.
--D
> + error = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_filestream_unmount;
> + }
> +
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> +"EXPERIMENTAL atomicwrites feature in use. Use at your own risk!");
> + }
> +
> if (xfs_has_reflink(mp)) {
> if (mp->m_sb.sb_rblocks) {
> xfs_alert(mp,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index f55d650f904a..c416f549e94d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct fsxattr {
> #define FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE 0x00010000 /* CoW extent size allocator hint */
> /* data extent mappings for regular files must be aligned to extent size hint */
> #define FS_XFLAG_FORCEALIGN 0x00020000
> +#define FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES 0x00040000 /* atomic writes enabled */
> #define FS_XFLAG_HASATTR 0x80000000 /* no DIFLAG for this */
>
> /* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists