[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKEwX=N-xuQume6C+xq0LfhVNOaK9rOiz_0c39GfoBB-4+6eng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:24:13 -0400
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, ryan.roberts@....com, ying.huang@...el.com,
21cnbao@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nanhai.zou@...el.com,
wajdi.k.feghali@...el.com, vinodh.gopal@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: Defines obj_cgroup_get() if CONFIG_MEMCG is not defined.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 3:50 PM Kanchana P Sridhar
<kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com> wrote:
>
> This resolves an issue with obj_cgroup_get() not being defined
> if CONFIG_MEMCG is not defined. This causes build errors if
> obj_cgroup_get() is called from code that is agnostic of CONFIG_MEMCG.
>
> The patch resolves this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@...el.com>
> ---
This is only exposed because of your zswap mTHP patch series right?
Could you include this patch as part of that series (since we don't
need this without that patch series), or make it clear in the change
log?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists