[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000fe6097062037e361@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:04:40 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+1fed2de07d8e11a3ec1b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.
***
Subject: possible deadlock in ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree
Author: djahchankoike@...il.com
#syz test
Acquiring the locks in refcounttree should follow
the ip_alloc --> ip_xattr ordering, as done by multiple
code paths in ocfs2; otherwise, we risk an ABBA deadlock
(i.e in the start transaction path).
Signed-off-by: Diogo Jahchan Koike <djahchankoike@...il.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
index 1f303b1adf1a..32c0249ff253 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
@@ -927,8 +927,8 @@ int ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree(struct inode *inode,
struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
- down_write(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
+ down_write(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
if (oi->ip_clusters)
goto out;
@@ -944,8 +944,8 @@ int ocfs2_try_remove_refcount_tree(struct inode *inode,
if (ret)
mlog_errno(ret);
out:
- up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
up_write(&oi->ip_xattr_sem);
+ up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
return 0;
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists