lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsZyq-_vUpruRHsR@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:05:15 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	joelaf@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched: Add pick_task(.core)

Hello, Peter.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:25:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to distinguish between a regular vs a core pick_task()
> invocation, add a boolean argument.
> 
> Notably SCX seems to need this, since its core pick

Tried converting scx to use the new interface and it looks like SCX doesn't
need this either. With small behavior changes around ENQ_LAST and
stopping/running, pick_task() can behave the same for regular and core-sched
cases.

Everything else looks fine too. Once this patchset gets applied, I'll pull
and update right away.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ