[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e93ccd6-803e-4750-a1dd-69f243f5ddb7@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:29:32 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (k10temp): Use cpu_feature_enabled() for
detecting zen
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 09:34:09AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 8/21/2024 08:09, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:35:57AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> > >
> > > This removes some boilerplate from the code and will allow adding
> > > future CPUs by just device IDs.
> > >
> >
> > I've been thinking that maybe we stop using PCI IDs entirely.
> >
> > The PCIe devices that we match on are internal to the SoC. And they're
> > not optional. They're basically processor components that are exposed
> > through PCI config space for software convenience.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yazen
>
> Yeah I think that's a good idea. The one thing I want to make sure remains
> though is that k10temp automatically loads from a CPU modalias.
>
> This is "tangential" to this patch except for the commit message reference
> to the PCI IDs.
>
Based on the feedback I will not accept this patch but wait for a solution
which is acceptable for everyone involved from AMD.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists