[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024082213-yogurt-kerosene-92e6@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:32:33 +0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] driver core: Ignore 0 in dev_err_probe()
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 04:12:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 03:38:15PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > In the similar way, ignore 0 error code (AKA "success") in
> > > dev_err_probe(). This helps to simplify a code such as
> > >
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > return dev_err_probe(int3472->dev, ret, err_msg);
>
> ...
>
> > This seems generally useful,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> > A nit, the code sequence that dev_err_probe() is documented to replace is
> > no longer matches with the behavior (the else would need if (err < 0)
> > added).
>
> Okay, let's wait what Greg says about it, if he is okay with the proposal,
> I'll amend documentation as well in v2.
I like it, and will be glad to take it if you update the documentation :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists