[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef8b3a3d-5791-f5c5-4362-7e2f87d726d0@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:46:24 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <kees@...nel.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
<quic_utiwari@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: enable bam pipe
locking/unlocking
On 8/16/2024 10:10 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 02:27:23PM GMT, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> enable bam pipe locking/unlocking for ipq9507 SoC.
>
> Note that the commit messages for the other non-dts commits will not
> show up in the git history for this file. So, please follow
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> and give some indication of "problem description", to give future
> readers an idea why this is here.
Ok
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Change in [v2]
>>
>> * enabled locking/unlocking support for ipq9574
>>
>> Change in [v1]
>>
>> * This patch was not included in [v1]
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index 48dfafea46a7..dacaec62ec39 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ cryptobam: dma-controller@...000 {
>> #dma-cells = <1>;
>> qcom,ee = <1>;
>> qcom,controlled-remotely;
>> + qcom,bam_pipe_lock;
>
> Per the question before about what does this actually lock. Is this a
> property of the BAM controller, or the crypto channel?
This is the property of BAM controller.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> };
>>
>> crypto: crypto@...000 {
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists