linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] ocfs2: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in ocfs2_set_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240821065517.3844044-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:55:17 +0800
From: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
To: <heming.zhao@...e.com>
CC: <jlbec@...lplan.org>, <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>,
        <mark@...heh.com>, <ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <syzbot+ab134185af9ef88dfed5@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] ocfs2: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:23:08 +0800, Heming Zhao wrote:
> Where is my "Reviewed-by" tag, and where is [patch 1/2]?
Sorry about your "Reviewed-by" tag, I remove it, if you don't mind, you can
add it by yourself.

In my previous email, I explicitly stated that only this patch should
be sent separately, as the first patch has already been reviewed by two
reviewers. If the second patch is updated with the first patch, I
personally think it is unnecessary.

[patch 1/2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820094512.2228159-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com/ 

Lizhi