[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a063827-5cf3-42df-a690-f3c644c10996@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:58:36 +0800
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "heming.zhao@...e.com" <heming.zhao@...e.com>,
Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
Cc: jlbec@...lplan.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark@...heh.com,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
syzbot+ab134185af9ef88dfed5@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] ocfs2: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in
ocfs2_set_buffer_uptodate
On 8/21/24 3:37 PM, heming.zhao@...e.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/21/24 14:55, Lizhi Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:23:08 +0800, Heming Zhao wrote:
>>> Where is my "Reviewed-by" tag, and where is [patch 1/2]?
>> Sorry about your "Reviewed-by" tag, I remove it, if you don't mind, you can
>> add it by yourself.
>
> Good answer!
>
> This patch issue was found by me, and I also pointed out how to fix it, then take the time
> to review your code. But in the end, you removed my "Reviewed-by" tag.
>
Seems a misunderstanding, take it easy:)
Lizhi may think since this is a new version, it needs a new round review.
>>
>> In my previous email, I explicitly stated that only this patch should
>> be sent separately, as the first patch has already been reviewed by two
>> reviewers. If the second patch is updated with the first patch, I
>> personally think it is unnecessary.
>>
>> [patch 1/2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820094512.2228159-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com/
>>
>> Lizhi
>
> It looks like you don't have basis knowledge of how to send patches.
>
> I will never reply to or review any of your mails/patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists