linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: phy-rockchip-inno-usb2: Perform trivial code cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83a33b5ad6dd13668b6d8733f5546725@manjaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 10:53:14 +0200
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: phy-rockchip-inno-usb2: Perform trivial code
 cleanups

Hello Heiko,

On 2024-08-21 10:39, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. August 2024, 09:37:53 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic:
>> Perform a few trivial code cleanups, e.g. to obey the reverse 
>> Christmas tree
>> rule, to avoid use of "{ ... }" code blocks where they aren't really 
>> needed,
>> or to avoid line wrapping by using the 100-column width better.
>> 
>> No intended functional changes are introduced by these code cleanups.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
> 
>> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ static int rockchip_usb2phy_extcon_register(struct 
>> rockchip_usb2phy *rphy)
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	rphy->edev = edev;
>> -
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> depending on how nitpicky we want to be, I'm not very fond of this 
> change.
> Assigning the extcon-dev and returning "0" are two different actions, 
> and
> I think most drivers do actually use a blank line between those.
> 
> But that really is just a style preference for me, so anyway
> 
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>

Thanks for your review; I had similar thoughts, believe it or not. :)  
If
there will be v3, I'll bring the empty separator line back.