linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Initialize st

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOpe7Sc8_ie97RXG2Wzw=0COOpKzRmThZA_W6RCuvVe7iC-C9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:04:23 +0900
From: Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@...il.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, 
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Initialize st_ops->tname with strdup()

Hi,

You're correct, I should add a NULL check.

zfree(&map->st_ops->tname) causes error because tname has
`const` qualifier.
Also, I found st_ops->type has the same issue.
Therefore, I propose removing `const` from `tname` and `type`
fields of `struct bpf_struct_ops`, and duplicating them from btf.

>
> Le 21/08/2024 à 08:46, Soma Nakata a écrit :
> > `tname` is returned by `btf__name_by_offset()` as well as `var_name`,
> > and these addresses point to strings in the btf. Since their locations
> > may change while loading the bpf program, using `strdup()` ensures
> > `tname` is safely stored.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@...il.com>
> > ---
> >   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index a3be6f8fac09..ece1f1af2cd4 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ static int init_struct_ops_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *sec_name,
> >               memcpy(st_ops->data,
> >                      data->d_buf + vsi->offset,
> >                      type->size);
> > -             st_ops->tname = tname;
> > +             st_ops->tname = strdup(tname);
>
> Hi,
>
> Should a NULL check be added (as done a few lines above for the
> [cm]alloc()) and bpf_map__destroy() updated with a
> zfree(&map->st_ops->tname) ?
>
> CJ
>
> >               st_ops->type = type;
> >               st_ops->type_id = type_id;
> >
>