[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240821105943.230281-3-ada@thorsis.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:59:33 +0200
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
Cc: Christian Melki <christian.melki@...ata.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:MICROCHIP OTPC DRIVER),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v1 02/12] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters
Makes no sense to have a timeout shorter than the sleep time, it would
run into timeout right after the first sleep already.
While at it, use a more specific macro instead of the generic one, which
does exactly the same, but needs less parameters.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
---
drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
index 03e60b99f2c9..bd3383eabdf6 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ static int mchp_otpc_prepare_read(struct mchp_otpc *otpc,
writel_relaxed(tmp, otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_CR);
/* Wait for packet to be transferred into temporary buffers. */
- return read_poll_timeout(readl_relaxed, tmp, !(tmp & MCHP_OTPC_SR_READ),
- 10000, 2000, false, otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_SR);
+ return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_SR, tmp,
+ !(tmp & MCHP_OTPC_SR_READ), 2000, 10000);
}
/*
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists