[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a8d8f5a-122d-4c26-b8d6-76a65e42216b@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:56:09 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] thermal: core: Drop redundant thermal instance
checks
On 21/08/2024 13:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 1:01 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 19/08/2024 17:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Because the trip and cdev pointers are sufficient to identify a thermal
>>> instance holding them unambiguously, drop the additional thermal zone
>>> checks from two loops walking the list of thermal instances in a
>>> thermal zone.
>>>
>>> No intentional functional impact.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>
>> I'm wondering if the thermal_instance 'tz' field could be removed too ?
>
> It is used in a debug printk in __thermal_cdev_update(). If that
> message can be dropped, then yes, but that would be a separate patch
> anyway.
Yes, I don't think it is really worth the debug message here
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists