[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsXZhmSZ1ioCtgoY@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:11:50 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Yang Ruibin <11162571@...o.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <opensource.kernel@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net:xfrm:use IS_ERR() with
__xfrm_policy_eval_candidates()
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 07:38:06AM -0400, Yang Ruibin wrote:
> __xfrm_policy_eval_candidates() function maybe returns
> error pointers,So use IS_ERR() to check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Ruibin <11162571@...o.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index c56c61b0c12e..2e412a48b981 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ xfrm_policy_eval_candidates(struct xfrm_pol_inexact_candidates *cand,
> tmp = __xfrm_policy_eval_candidates(cand->res[i],
> prefer,
> fl, type, family, if_id);
> - if (!tmp)
> + if (IS_ERR(tmp))
> continue;
This looks wrong. The error case is already handled below.
> if (IS_ERR(tmp))
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists