linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: dapm-graph: add component on/off and route names to graph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7c03710-161e-465c-b480-7b599c78a51d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:56:26 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: dapm-graph: add component on/off and route
 names to graph

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 10:17:48AM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
> > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

> I'm sorry about the noise. I thought it was worth in this case because:

>  * this series has been sent 2.5 months ago
>  * there was no reply at all
>  * AFAIK and according to MAINTAINERS there is no patchwork catching
>    tools/sound/

> So it was looking much more like something gone into oblivion than
> being on someone's TODO list.

That would be the resend part of the mail - content free pings can't be
directly acted on, they're just noise.  Note also that you should
generally rebase and resend things after the merge window.

> After doing so now however, I must say that while counting the resends
> is easy, counting the pings in a somewhat reliable way is very time
> consuming. It would be nice to have this info in a more reachable way
> (MAINTAINERS?).

Feel free to take that up with the MAINTAINERS people.  It's hard to
specify things in a snappy one liner kind of way.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)