[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef273629d92e108ad166faf1f4abccac6cda461a@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:16:12 +0000
From: jeff.xie@...ux.dev
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xiehuan09@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Get the true parent ip for function tracer
August 21, 2024 at 9:59 PM, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
Hi Steven,
>
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:27:55 +0800
>
> Jeff Xie <jeff.xie@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xie <jeff.xie@...ux.dev>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > kernel/trace/trace_functions.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> >
> > index 3b0cea37e029..273b8c7eeb2d 100644
> >
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> >
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions.c
> >
> > @@ -176,6 +176,19 @@ static void function_trace_start(struct trace_array *tr)
> >
> > tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->array_buffer);
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > +static unsigned long
> >
> > +function_get_true_parent_ip(unsigned long parent_ip, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> >
>
> I wonder if we should make this inline, or even __always_inline, as this
>
> will be called in a very hot path, and I want to make sure that the
>
> compiler always inlines it. It likely should, but we should also give the
>
> compiler a hint that it should.
Yes, Thank you for your suggestion. It is indeed a very hot path,
and I will add __always_inline in the next version.
>
> -- Steve
>
> >
> > +{
> >
> > + unsigned long true_parent_ip;
> >
> > + int idx = 0;
> >
> > +
> >
> > + true_parent_ip = parent_ip;
> >
> > + if (unlikely(parent_ip == (unsigned long)&return_to_handler))
> >
> > + true_parent_ip = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, &idx, parent_ip,
> >
> > + (unsigned long *)fregs->regs.sp);
> >
> > + return true_parent_ip;
> >
> > +}
> >
> > +
> >
> > static void
> >
> > function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > struct ftrace_ops *op, struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> >
> > @@ -193,6 +206,8 @@ function_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > if (bit < 0)
> >
> > return;
> >
> >
> >
> > + parent_ip = function_get_true_parent_ip(parent_ip, fregs);
> >
> > +
> >
> > trace_ctx = tracing_gen_ctx();
> >
> >
> >
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> > @@ -241,6 +256,7 @@ function_stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > * recursive protection is performed.
> >
> > */
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> >
> > + parent_ip = function_get_true_parent_ip(parent_ip, fregs);
> >
> > cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> >
> > data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data, cpu);
> >
> > disabled = atomic_inc_return(&data->disabled);
> >
> > @@ -309,6 +325,7 @@ function_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > if (bit < 0)
> >
> > return;
> >
> >
> >
> > + parent_ip = function_get_true_parent_ip(parent_ip, fregs);
> >
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> > data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data, cpu);
> >
> > if (atomic_read(&data->disabled))
> >
> > @@ -356,6 +373,7 @@ function_stack_no_repeats_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> >
> > * recursive protection is performed.
> >
> > */
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> >
> > + parent_ip = function_get_true_parent_ip(parent_ip, fregs);
> >
> > cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> >
> > data = per_cpu_ptr(tr->array_buffer.data, cpu);
> >
> > disabled = atomic_inc_return(&data->disabled);
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists