lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZsX79M3RcertYHQZ@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:38:44 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	kramasub@...omium.org, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
	Li Zhe <lizhe.67@...edance.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Zhou jie <zhoujie@...china.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Don't proxy console= to earlycon

On Thu 2024-08-08 11:30:53, Raul Rangel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 11:57 AM Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > Your patch is good then. Well, would you mind to add a comment into
> > > the code and make the commit message more clear even for dummies like
> > > me?
> > >
> > > Something like the patch below. It would be better to split it into
> > > two:
> > >
> > >    + 1st shuffling the check and adding the first part of the comment
> > >    + 2nd fixing the case with empty console= options.
> > >
> > > I could prepare the patchset. I would keep your SOB for the 2nd patch
> > > if you agreed.
> >
> > Yes, feel free. Thanks!
> >
> 
> Hey Petr,
> I was just following up on this. Were you going to prepare the two patches?

I have been quite overloaded last two years. It would help me a lot if
you could prepare the two patches and send them for review.

Thanks for re-opening this. It has already fallen through cracks on my
side /o\.

Best Regards,
Petr

> > > Here is the proposal:
> > >
> > > From d2fb7c54bed4c67df229c56fcc1b0af83ada5227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 19:17:25 -0600
> > > Subject: [PATCH] init: Don't proxy the empty console= options to earlycon
> > >
> > > Right now we are proxying the `console=XXX` command line args to the
> > > param_setup_earlycon. This is done because the early consoles used to
> > > be enabled via the `console` parameter.
> > >
> > > The `earlycon` parameter was added later by the commit 18a8bd949d6adb311
> > > ("serial: convert early_uart to earlycon for 8250"). It allowed to
> > > setup the early consoles using another callback. And it was indeed
> > > more self-explanatory and cleaner approach.
> > >
> > > As a result, for example, the following parameters have the same effect:
> > >
> > >     console=uart[8250],mmio,<addr>[,options]
> > >     earlycon=uart[8250],mmio,<addr>[,options]
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, `console` and `earlycon` parameters behave different when
> > > the options do not match an early console. setup_earlycon() accepts only
> > > console names in __earlycon_table. Also the empty options are handled
> > > differently:
> > >
> > >   + When `earlycon=` or just `earlycon` is specified on the command line,
> > >     param_setup_earlycon() tries to enable an early console via the SPCR
> > >     table or the device tree.
> > >
> > >   + When `console=` is specified on the command line, it's intention is to
> > >     disable the console.
> > >
> > > Here comes the problem. The current code calls param_setup_earlycon()
> > > even when `console=` is used with no options. As a result, it might
> > > enable the early console when it is defined in the SPCR table or
> > > a device tree. This is obviously not what users want.
> > >
> > > The early console should be enabled via SPCR or DT only when `earlycon`
> > > is used explicitly with no options.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> > > [pmladek@...e.com: Add comments and more details into the commit message]
> > > ---
> > >  init/main.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> > > index ad920fac325c..3b059e316e62 100644
> > > --- a/init/main.c
> > > +++ b/init/main.c
> > > @@ -733,13 +733,25 @@ static int __init do_early_param(char *param, char *val,
> > >         const struct obs_kernel_param *p;
> > >
> > >         for (p = __setup_start; p < __setup_end; p++) {
> > > -               if ((p->early && parameq(param, p->str)) ||
> > > -                   (strcmp(param, "console") == 0 &&
> > > -                    strcmp(p->str, "earlycon") == 0)
> > > -               ) {
> > > +               if (p->early && parameq(param, p->str)) {
> > >                         if (p->setup_func(val) != 0)
> > >                                 pr_warn("Malformed early option '%s'\n", param);
> > >                 }
> > > +
> > > +               /*
> > > +                * Early consoles can be historically enabled also when earlycon
> > > +                * specific options are passed via console=[earlycon options]
> > > +                * parameter.
> > > +                *
> > > +                * Do not try it with an empty value. "console=" is used to
> > > +                * disable real normal consoles. While "earlycon" is used to
> > > +                * enable an early console via SPCR or DT.
> > > +                */
> > > +               if (strcmp(param, "console") == 0 && val && val[0] &&
> > > +                   strcmp(p->str, "earlycon") == 0) {
> > > +                       if (p->setup_func(val) != 0)
> > > +                               pr_warn("Failed to setup earlycon via console=%s\n", val);
> > > +               }
> > >         }
> > >         /* We accept everything at this stage. */
> > >         return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.35.3
> > >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> 
> Thanks,
> Raul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ