linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] drm/i915/hwmon: expose fan speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zsc85iQIBpOPJOKp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:28:06 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, tursulin@...ulin.net, airlied@...il.com,
	daniel@...ll.ch, linux@...ck-us.net, andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	anshuman.gupta@...el.com, badal.nilawar@...el.com,
	riana.tauro@...el.com, ashutosh.dixit@...el.com,
	karthik.poosa@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] drm/i915/hwmon: expose fan speed

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:28:38AM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 05:06:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 04:12:46PM +0300, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 01:23:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:50:10AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > But it still has an issue with 64-bit division on 32-bit platforms, right?
> > > > 
> > > > > +	/*
> > > > > +	 * Calculate fan speed in RPM by time averaging two subsequent
> > > > > +	 * readings in minutes.
> > > > > +	 * RPM = number of rotations * msecs per minute / time in msecs
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	*val = DIV_ROUND_UP(rotations * (MSEC_PER_SEC * 60), time);
> > > > 
> > > > ...somewhere here?
> > > 
> > > Use div64_u64() instead? Or is there a better alternative?
> > 
> > I don't know the code well to offer anything better. Probably for a starter
> > you can switch to use DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL().
> 
> This one seems to work. Does it warrant an explanation here?

You mean _ULL part? No.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko