linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] phy: open_alliance_helpers: Add defines for link quality metrics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7d06672-9113-4bbc-b141-361957140522@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:48:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] phy: open_alliance_helpers: Add defines
 for link quality metrics

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:59:37PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Introduce a set of defines for link quality (LQ) related metrics in the
> Open Alliance helpers. These metrics include:
> 
> - `oa_lq_lfl_esd_event_count`: Number of ESD events detected by the Link
>   Failures and Losses (LFL).
> - `oa_lq_link_training_time`: Time required to establish a link.
> - `oa_lq_remote_receiver_time`: Time required until the remote receiver
>   signals that it is locked.
> - `oa_lq_local_receiver_time`: Time required until the local receiver is
>   locked.
> - `oa_lq_lfl_link_loss_count`: Number of link losses.
> - `oa_lq_lfl_link_failure_count`: Number of link failures that do not
>   cause a link loss.
> 
> These standardized defines will be used by PHY drivers to report these
> statistics.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew